During the last months I have considered modifying my way of aprecciating hifi gears.
In so many years of listening and owning and selling and distribuiting
hifi equipment, something has broken. I have learnt to making less
mistakes, even though it means at the end less fun in exchange of more
satisfaction.
Strange eh? If I do not allow me to make mistakes I
could not try later to solve these same mistakes, to improve things, in this
case sound reproduction. And a lot of the game in hifi is concentrated on it.
How not to make mistakes? I have thought
about it and the easiest and most efficace answer I have is: to know what you are
able to really love. Easy with many years of experience but difficult at the
beginning.
It is nevertheless fascinating how a certain basic sound taste stays
inside us almost unaltered. We cover it, we kill it, we modify it only to
realise after a while that it is always there.
I remember, many years ago, maybe in the very early '90 I was
listening and comparing cables with my, at that time Arcam CD drive and
separate DAC. For digital cable, at the end of many comparisons, I was enjoying
much more an expensive MIT then anything else. Its dynamic freedom, this kind of
free breathing was talking to my sensibility. But of course its timbre were not
as beautiful as another cable I had on hand and a little monochromes. So you think I would
like also high efficient speakers? No, I have never liked them since generally
they are more coloured then other designs and when my ears detect a coloration
they will magnify it little by little after every exposure so that within few
days I could not stand it.
So I should like electric cross overs? Yes I love them. You get much
more free breathing with them, but many amps, many cables, cost and
complication rise the bar too much for my economic situation and space
allowance.
What I have done in all these years is starting liking many audio
things, but loving very, very few of them. It was like a curse. The more things I was liking the less things I was loving. I started liking the way some equipment were able to reproduce timbres, the way they could paint an
acoustic landscape, and so on. But at the end, within their good qualities and within the admiration I had for some of their capabilities, for me they were more or less useless, at
least on an deep listening level relation.
The most important basic feature that an hifi gear has to have for me is
to be able to talk to my heart, not just to be interesting in a way or in
another.
How many times, it happens
that something is better in almost all reproduction parameters in comparison to
something else but miserably fail to move us ? So why we end up with things like that ? It is because when
we have to spend our hard gained money we try to be reasonable, but when we try
to be raisonable in an heart affair (and music is an heart affair) we make
mistakes. So when we choose our new amplifier in comparison with our old one,
and we ear better bass, better high, better immaging, then we are selling
ourselves that product, we are allowing us to spend that money since we have,what
we think , a valid reason to do so. At the end this very valid reason become the
worst reason, since, after a short or a long while, we relise we were enjoying
our music more with our previous amplifier. Everybody has done
this same mistake in his hifi journey, and me of course included.
Since I am not paid, nor I receive any gift from anybody in the audio
bussiness, I have made the decision to change, from now on, my way of writing
about hifi gears. I will try not to write about what you could like, like a professional audio
writer does, and trying to describe a sound in a way that, from his writing, you
may think you would be able to like it or not. My positive conclusion will
only be based on if something is capable of talking to my heart or not.
Yes, I will become much more subjective. I think it will be easier also
for you that are reading me. At the end you will be able to discover if you
have more or less the same taste that I have.
And this will happen starting from right now. Right from this cartridge.
It is listening to this cartridge that at the end brought me to consider this choice.
Now to this cartridge.
Now to this cartridge.
This is An EMT cartridge. EMT is an old firm and bla bla bla, you
remember I am not paid to describe everything and to try to show I have earnt
my salary, so if you are interested in knowing more about EMT you can do your
researches. It is the less expensive in their range, and according to Mr.
M.Huber at EMT, "Our experience is that – if treated carefully – the
diamond will last for 2’000 hours. High tonearm friction values will reduce the
lifetime".
It is a fairly high
output MC so no need for step up transformers (even though I love what step up
trasformer do, I just said no need of it) if you have a decent MC phono preamp.
I have tried with few phono preamps with no problem, from a Trichord Dino to a
very expensive Lamm. I found the optimal loading to be spot on with EMT
recomandation between 200 to 300 ohms.
The building quality is quite good ; I am
just a little disappointed in the quality of the red painting of its body that
has a clear imperfection on one side of the cartridge, like a finger print... This could be
easily avoided I think without the production being more expensive at the
end.
What you have with this cartridge after the
very needed 50 hours break in ?
The first
thing you notice is a certain sense of
completeness.
You are not called upon a certain aspect of
the music reproduction, like delicacy, timbre, or bass, or drive, or whatever, but
you are called upon earing the music. This is extremely rare. It has enough
drive, enough image specificity, enough bass, enough high, enough nuances,
enough trasparence, enough of any parameters in a way that any parameter is
neither left behind nor pushed foreward so that you have this sense of
completeness I have talked about.
If this will be your only cartridge and you
won’t compare it with anything else, this will be enough. But to appreciate and to
quantify the long list of enoughs that this cartridge is capable of, we have to
compare to other cartridges in the same price range and beyond.
Comparing it with
some same category price champions cartridges I don’t think will be a question
of taste : the EMT HSD006 is just better, if you listen to music. If your
goal is to listen to hifi you could prefer something else.
It is better not just because of its
completeness but also because it exposes shortcomings in other similar prized
cartridges and also some much more expensive ones. Maybe one has better
midrange glow or delicacy but just a little bit, and at the
end this little bit is heavily paid by much
less drive. Maybe another cartridge is a little more silky, but it pays
off this little more silkness with a lot less transparency. And so on. Of
course if you are one that has one specific sonic attribute where all your
emotions are concentrated you could prefer something else only in direct
comparison since the EMT will give enough of it in its own. None on my hands, except a much more expensive Koetzu had better colours, and its drive was almost on a pair with Deccas, none had the life in it like the 006 has, except the now out of production Myabi Standard. You soon realize that it can compete in certain parameter with almost any cartridge and if looses on them it will looses slightly but when it gains in athor parameters it gains easily.
Hoe it can be betterred? Many things like a more silk top end, a slightly better image hight, a slightly more differenciated bass, and a slightly richer mid high reproduction, and transparency, but… if to get one of these things better, it means altering the pleasure this cartridge is capable of giving, please don’t touch it ! Leave it the way it is !Please do it for us.
Hoe it can be betterred? Many things like a more silk top end, a slightly better image hight, a slightly more differenciated bass, and a slightly richer mid high reproduction, and transparency, but… if to get one of these things better, it means altering the pleasure this cartridge is capable of giving, please don’t touch it ! Leave it the way it is !Please do it for us.
This will be my daily pleasure cartridge,
capable to reproduce effectively and with the right attitude all my very
different music collection, from Baroque to Reggae and Jazz and some Pop too.
For the specials occasions I have many others cartridges
that I can love for that « certain » moment, when I crave
transparency, or a beautiful midrange golden glow.
How it will sound a much more expensive EMT
JSD Pure Black or the beautiful green JSD Pure Lime, or the Platinum ? It
will be dangerous to discover it out…
At the end the JSD 006 easily achieve things that too many even much more expensive cartridges fail to achieve: to reproduce the emotion in the music it is playing. Too many times cartridges and other hifi equipment don't know how to do it. In their quest of a flatter response or a better something else they get lost in the steril dettails, perfectly detectable by our ears and brain but absolutely tasteless for our soul.
Considering the reproduction of music is for me absolutely undissociable to the capability to reproduce its emotional content, the EMT JSD 006 is very simply one of the best
product in hifi history. And of course it will appear in my new Favourites sections.
PS: in the coming week I will be updating all my recommended components. No more great hifi products only great soul movers... the problem is that many, too many, if not allmost all new products are just great hifi products...